In fairness to the O-line, there were injuries and people in and out and substitutions for that reason, and also playing out of their usual spots early in the season.JohnHenry wrote:In fairness to Printers, he played more when our OL was atrocious. He had regressed to the point he was watching the backs of the OL, not looking downfield, and many pundits complained about his "nervous feet" and he was a "nervous wreck". Let's not forget that Lulay was pretty crummy earlier this season behind our porous OL, too. Our OL substantially improved later in the season. In the last two games, Lulay had the confidence to look downfield and could sense his protection with only the corner of his eye. That will allow any QB to play better.
Stats aside, fans have to feel good about how Lulay performed in the last two pressure-packed games, on the road in hostile environments. He emerged as a team leader and exhibited all the skills you would want in your starting QB.
I also believe it is easier to play the position if you know where the QB you are trying to protect is going to be on a given play. Printers was way more of an "ad-lib" type of QB than Lulay or Jackson. I think that Lulay plays within the system and that helps the O-line. Whether people like Chapdelaine's system or not, I think that most would agree that any system is better than none.