Page 3 of 4

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:42 pm
by SammyGreene
Sayles with some redemption. Still not out of the woods yet

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:42 pm
by Lion Guy
And they hold. Jeez.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:43 pm
by Lion Guy
Need 3 first downs.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:47 pm
by Coast Mountain Lion
:bang:

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:50 pm
by Coast Mountain Lion
Run out the clock. How difficult is that?

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:55 pm
by SammyGreene
4-1 but ugly to say the least.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:56 pm
by swervynmerv
Lions win one I'm not sure they really deserved too.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:57 pm
by Lion Guy
Ugly win. BUT. Last year would have been an ugly loss. So let’s take it and run. Need to stay in the playoff/crossover mix.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 10:06 pm
by Lion Guy
I b**ch about the D. But they gave up 12 points. So props to them.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 10:11 pm
by swervynmerv
Lion Guy wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:57 pm
Ugly win. BUT. Last year would have been an ugly loss. So let’s take it and run. Need to stay in the playoff/crossover mix.
Very valid point, last year we would have blown it for sure. 2 points is 2 points.

Lots to clean up on both sides of the ball. Part of me wonders if having the bye twice so early in the season messed with momentum of a young team. Offence in particular really looks out of sync coming out of the bye week.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 11:34 pm
by David
Happy of course with the "W," but my biggest concerns thus far after 5 games:

* Special teams coverage (we're allowing teams to routinely scrimmage from the 40-yard line after kick-offs)
* Poor tackling (too many backs and receivers are squirming free for extra yards)
* Soft defensive coverage (too easy to get 8-12 yard completions against)
* Special teams returns (we're continually scrimmaging with a long field)


DH :cool:

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 11:43 pm
by B.C.FAN
Lion Guy wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 10:06 pm
I b**ch about the D. But they gave up 12 points. So props to them.
Yes, and they made a number of critical stops in the fourth quarter when the offence couldn’t
move the ball. It was an ugly win but we’ll take it.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2022 11:45 pm
by TheLionKing
Not a Picasso but a win is a win. Agree with other posters that tackling is atrocious. Anyone know why Evans spiked the ball with a minute and a half remaining ? There is a bit of revival in the running game which is a good sign.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2022 6:20 am
by DanoT
Lions looked like Rich Stubler coached D: bend but don't break, giving up lots of yardage but very few points.

From the start of the season I have maintained that Lions have arguably the best set of DBs (especially when considering SAM LB Purifoy is a DB) in the CFL. I now
think Ti-Cats have the second best DBs.

Not what I would call a very entertaining win but a satisfying and needed to keep pace with the rest of the west, victory.

Re: Lions v Tiger-Cats July 21

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2022 7:16 am
by CrazyCanuck89
DanoT wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 6:20 am
Lions looked like Rich Stubler coached D: bend but don't break, giving up lots of yardage but very few points.

From the start of the season I have maintained that Lions have arguably the best set of DBs (especially when considering SAM LB Purifoy is a DB) in the CFL. I now
think Ti-Cats have the second best DBs.

Not what I would call a very entertaining win but a satisfying and needed to keep pace with the rest of the west, victory.
I don't think many people call the SAM linebacker a defensive back, if they did people would be referring to him as a nickelback. The position has never changed, only the body type.