Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:53 am
I'm sure he'll make an impact, much like he did last week.Robbie wrote:Darrell Jackson is expected to play on Sunday, but D.J. Hackett and Marcus Trufant are still doubtful.
Lionbackers.com
The Original BC Lions Football Fan Forum since 99
https://www.Lionbackers.com/bc_lions/
Official 2006 Seattle Seahawks Thread
Page 17 of 19
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:52 pm
The Million Dollar Question: Will Rex Grossman show up?
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:43 am
21-14 Chicago at halftime. The Seahawks defence must really contain Chicago in the second half if Seattle is to advance. 
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:21 pm
Crap. NOW who do I cheer for? :x
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:30 pm
The Saints.CatsEyes wrote:Crap. NOW who do I cheer for? :x
Reasons why:
1. Hurricane Katrina (on the road all last season).
2. Never played in the NFC championship game, never mind the Super Bowl.
3. 3-13 last season.
Tough one for the Hawks. Patched-up defence was good enough in second half but Hasselbeck can't move his team into range for game-winning FG on three possessions.
Like the Saints chances A LOT next week.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:30 pm
I've been quietly cheering for the Saints all season. Hopefully their run this year is re-igniting the city of New Orleans and the state of Louisiana.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:38 pm
Yeah I guess....... 
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:51 pm
Who do we cheer for between New England and San Diego? Shannon says the Patriots, but I think that's the 4th mimosa talking (and her love of Tom Brady). Please advise.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:02 pm
Chargers. Long suffering, totally deserving. Besides, DD was once in Chargers' Camp.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:02 pm
I'm going for the Chargers because A) Dickenson used to play for them and B) The Patriots have been there enough in the last few years.pinkfreud wrote:Who do we cheer for between New England and San Diego? Shannon says the Patriots, but I think that's the 4th mimosa talking (and her love of Tom Brady). Please advise.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:10 pm
Not to nitpick, Kim - but Dickenson didn't exactly "play" for the Chargers. He was, however a great clipboard holder.CatsEyes wrote:I'm going for the Chargers because A) Dickenson used to play for them and B) The Patriots have been there enough in the last few years.pinkfreud wrote:Who do we cheer for between New England and San Diego? Shannon says the Patriots, but I think that's the 4th mimosa talking (and her love of Tom Brady). Please advise.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:16 pm
He played a preseason game, IIRC!Bosco wrote:Not to nitpick, Kim - but Dickenson didn't exactly "play" for the Chargers. He was, however a great clipboard holder.
Hey, I had to think of SOMEthing! There's no one left that I really like. The Iggles are gone, the Hawks are gone. Guess I can go with the sentimental crowd and go for the Saints, but it'll be a stretch. :lol:Dickenson/Charger article
Dickenson didn't play in the Chargers' second preseason game, but in the opener he starred, playing the final three quarters in a win at San Francisco. He completed 17 of 27 passes for 192 yards and a touchdown in relief of Flutie, throwing a three-yard scoring pass and two-point conversion with 39 seconds remaining to win the game.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:20 pm
Never gamble on a Marty Schottenheimer coached team. 
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:27 pm
Yeah, but it's kind of a lesser of 2 evils thing for me! :lol: Do we REALLY want to see the Pats in the Super Bowl again? I know they weren't in it last year, but they've been in it often enough in recent history, that they're starting to remind me of the Alouettes of yore! :lol:Bosco wrote:Never gamble on a Marty Schottenheimer coached team.
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:33 pm
Now if you're referring to the 2000-2006 Alouettes, then I agree - but if your talking about the 1974 - 1979 Als, hey...that was MY team! :lol: