Okay, then. So you're not saying a good coach isn't important, but I am telling you it is CRITICALLY important. This was a good team, as evidenced by some big wins down the stretch. It had talent across the board that belied our 9-10 overall record. Ed Hervey acquired Lemon, Awe, Posey, Parker, Sutton after the Week One. I submit with the talent we had, we should have won 3 more games overall. Not gone down listlessly and blown out in the final 3 games of the season, including a 40 point differential in the playoff loss.The_Pauser wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:29 pmI'm not saying it isn't important. Just that it's not as important as some people make it out to be. A great coach isn't going to be successful if he doesn't have a good team. But I've noticed a tendency for people to put way too much blame at the feet of our coaches, or perhaps they overrate the talent this team has.David wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 10:55 amRespectfully, the head coaching position in football is critically important. He may not succeed all the time with bad quarterbacking, but the flip side of your argument doesn't guarantee a bad or mediocre coach will succeed with good quarterbacking either. Take the 2018 Edmonton Eskimos. This team featured (arguably) the best quarterback in the league and a future Hall of Famer in Mike Reilly and didn't even make the playoffs.The_Pauser wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 12:35 pmBill Belichick was merely an average NFL head coach before he got Tom Brady, with a pre-Brady record of 41-55.
I think people put way too much stock in a coach. Yes they do play an important role, but even someone who's considered the best NFL Head Coach of all time was not looking very good before he got arguably the greatest QB of all time as his QB.
DH
I am quite certain that with Dave Dickenson's or Rick Campbell's staff, this club would have won more games.
DH