Yes, that's very true. As soon as you mentioned Most Outstanding Canadian, I can't help but comment once again about the huge CBC blunder when they originally announced that he was Most Valuable Player instead of Baltimore's Karl Anthony who won it in a losing cause. It's good that the Lions defence forced Baltimore to do a two and out - on first down the stopped Mike Pringle with only a small gain on a rushing play, and then most importantly forced an incomplete pass when Tracy Ham attempted a passing play on 2nd down. Now suppose.....Lui managed to score with 37-yards left. With 1:02 remaining there was still enough time for Baltimore to go downfield to tie the game with a FG of their own or even with with a TD.Blitz wrote:Its amazing Robbie, how, with the passage of time, how reporters can distort or rewrite history, often by omission.Robbie wrote:It's good that you remember that. Passaglia was only 2 out of 5 in field goals in that important game and fortunately it didn't come back and haunt the Lions. The successful field goals were from 23 and 29 yards. He and the Lions were not so fortunately in the 1988 Grey Cup in which he went 1 out of 3 in field goals and that proved a difference in that one point loss.Blitz wrote:Nice article but when mentioning Passaglia kicking the winning points in our Grey Cup win over Montreal, is that Passaaglia missed a 47 yd. field goal attempt and a 33 yd. field goal attempt in that game. Passaglia's winning field goal was from 29 yds.
And the term winning field goal is a slight misnomer as it implies that the Lions were trailing or at least tied in the game and Lui's FG immediately won the game just like the 1994 Grey Cup. Lui's FG in the late stages of the 2000 Grey Cup simply gave the Lions some more breathing room as it extended the lead form 25-20 to 28-20. After that, the Lions secondary really messed up and allowed the Alouettes to allow a late TD to make it 28-26 but the Lions managed to stop the 2-point conversion attempt and then recovered the onside kick. So the article is more accurate in that they eventually turned out to be the winning points, but the term winning field goal is a misnomer. I'm sure you all agree that Lui's last FG in the 2000 Grey Cup doesn't nearly fall in the same category as Lui's final FG in the 1994 Grey Cup, and for the two championships for that matter.
Another example is the 1994 Grey Cup. We see or read about Passaglia kicking the game winning field goal, with no time left on the clock to beat Baltimore. But Passaglia had an opportunity to kick a 37-yard field goal with 1:02 left in regulation and missed. We were very lucky that Baltimore went two and out and Passaglia was given another opportunity from 38 yds. and he is named the Most Outstanding Canadian in the game.
Ten years ago on this thread http://lionbackers.com/bc_lions/viewtop ... 1&start=75 I mentioned that in a CBC article about the best Grey Cup games it made an extremely inaccurate statement about the 2000 Grey Cup when it stated that the Lions trailed Montreal 26-25 late in the game and then Lui came in and kicked the Grey Cup winning field goal for the 28-26 win.
Speaking of field goals in a Grey Cup - Passaglia went 5 out of 6 in the 1985 Grey Cup and that gave the Lions some breathing room in their 37-24 win. We all know that McCallum went 6 for 6 to complement the only single converted TD in the 25-14 2006 Grey Cup. And McCallum went 4 for 5 in the eventual 34-23 win in the 2011 Grey Cup, including the last FG after Winnipeg scored two late TD's to make it a two score lead. In the 1983 Grey Cup, the Argonauts with Hank Ilesic only went 1-4 in FG's and may have gotten the lead earlier had he converted them. And in the 1988 Grey Cup, Winnipeg only scored one TD as opposed to BC's two TD's but the difference was that Trevor Kennerd went 4 for 5 in field goals and Bob Cameron punted very well into the strong wind resulting in a pair of singles in the eventual one point win.