Sure, his best days are behind him at 34, but an already fearsome pass rush just got stronger as the Eskimos acquire John Chick from Hamilton in what amounts to an exchange of 2018 draft picks (Hamilton gets Edmonton's 2nd round pick, and send them their 5th round pick). Details here.
DH
The rich get richer - Esks aquire Chick
Moderator: Team Captains
- Toppy Vann
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9794
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm
It seems a sign of dumping an older guy and $$$$ whose not lighting it up (0 and 8) for futures. Esks can afford to get a short termer here as they're beaten up a bit.
"Ability without character will lose." - Marv Levy
Meh. Chick's best days are behind him. If he does find his old groove then the Esks really win this trade/salary dump. If he plays at 2017 pace, he doesn't see much playing time. I would think other teams were offered Chick and this the best trade in return, that says alot about how teams view his ability.
Entertainment value = an all time low
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 25103
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
- Location: Vancouver
A depth move by the Esks. Can never have enough depth.
- Hambone
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8215
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:25 pm
- Location: Living in PG when not at BC Place, Grey Cup or Mazatlan.
Esks DL has also been hit hard with injuries. They already lost Howard and Hunt to the 6G and Sewell is on the 1G. Going after Chick might be a sign Sewell is going to be out a bit longer.
Chick has largely been invisible this year. A graphic I saw during their 6th game of the season vs Edmonton showed him with 1 sack and 7 pressures. Quite average to mediocre given last year he had 14 sacks. What sprang to mind for me was this was a sign of decline. A player like Chick has been successful thanks to his explosivenes and burst off the snap. That his combined sack and pressure numbers are where they are indicates to me that he has lost some of that explosiveness which is only natural. That Father Time is catching up to a defensive end usually shows up first in the player's quickness. Just losing a fraction off burst can turn a very good DE into an average or mediocre one.
Chick has largely been invisible this year. A graphic I saw during their 6th game of the season vs Edmonton showed him with 1 sack and 7 pressures. Quite average to mediocre given last year he had 14 sacks. What sprang to mind for me was this was a sign of decline. A player like Chick has been successful thanks to his explosivenes and burst off the snap. That his combined sack and pressure numbers are where they are indicates to me that he has lost some of that explosiveness which is only natural. That Father Time is catching up to a defensive end usually shows up first in the player's quickness. Just losing a fraction off burst can turn a very good DE into an average or mediocre one.
You're as old as you've ever been and as young as you're ever going to be.
Wally just signed Ricky Foley a couple of weeks ago and he is 35 years old. We didn't have to trade any draft choices for him.
But he is an older player, has been less productive than Chick in recent seasons, and we picked him up for depth.
But he is an older player, has been less productive than Chick in recent seasons, and we picked him up for depth.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
- Roscoe Baggins
- prospect
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:35 pm
Sewell is a DT, Chick is a DE. What does one have to do with the other?Hambone wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2017 4:31 pmEsks DL has also been hit hard with injuries. They already lost Howard and Hunt to the 6G and Sewell is on the 1G. Going after Chick might be a sign Sewell is going to be out a bit longer.
Chick has largely been invisible this year. A graphic I saw during their 6th game of the season vs Edmonton showed him with 1 sack and 7 pressures. Quite average to mediocre given last year he had 14 sacks. What sprang to mind for me was this was a sign of decline. A player like Chick has been successful thanks to his explosivenes and burst off the snap. That his combined sack and pressure numbers are where they are indicates to me that he has lost some of that explosiveness which is only natural. That Father Time is catching up to a defensive end usually shows up first in the player's quickness. Just losing a fraction off burst can turn a very good DE into an average or mediocre one.