1040 called out Wally this morning - update: 10/13/15

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

InUrFace
Rookie
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:31 pm

Angus agreed and said Wallys end of career is struggling and the game passed him by ...his systems no longer works here and his contacts have retired/moved on..he also said he is a control freak and has the last say in everything.
Angus told 1040, we need changes at the top ..new owner/GM to connect to younger fan base. The owner should be from Vancouver which will be heavily involved with this franchise.

(podcast up later.)

Like I said long ago about Wally, well its time for that change. The time is now. :yahoo: :beer:
User avatar
Toppy Vann
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9793
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm

I don't fully agree with the owner has to be from Vancouver. We are lucky to have an owner not an idiot. We could have a lot worse as those of us who know the CFL for the last 20 years or more have witnessed including right here in BC.

I think the Lions haven't done much to retool their scouting in the USA like other teams - that is true.

On the surface of it, Jeff T was a brilliant hire but we could fault Wally for not getting deeper into what was going to be done BUT Wally too was in a bind. Unlike others I felt Mike Benevides was digging his own grave with what he was and wasn't doing while those here blame it all on Wally. Yes we can fault him for the selection which seems to have a strong religious bent thru to the strength/conditioning coach whose on twitter supporting it seems Manny Arseneaux in his play etc as is Gore and now Manny is calling those discussing his interview as "foolish".

The team is leaderless in the HC position it seems. The lights are on but it's vacant as to a vision, purpose and performance oriented culture.

How many days since the game and no backing down from Arseneaux and they have to go to MTL next and face that off field idiocy. Why let that be narrative?
Last edited by Toppy Vann on Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Ability without character will lose." - Marv Levy
User avatar
Rammer
Team Captain
Posts: 22320
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:04 pm
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.

If I were to assess the current Lion struggles it would begin with Wally. The release of several key vets over the past two seasons have gutted the leadership and the infield play. Tedford while not showing a progression with the current group that I fully expected, was saddled with McMann and Mark Washington (also the biggest disappointment). Both of those coaching positions have put the Lions at the lowest level statistically of all 9 teams, which is on Wally's shoulders.

In Washington I would think that he is in discussion with Wally and we see the old school Wally D concepts that use to rely on the superior players Wally was blessed with. Right now, the talent of the DL can't get to the QB and can't run stop, that is even with Bighill and SolE (prior to injury).

In the end the saddest part is that I was hoping for a playoff berth, expecting the team to get better as the season moved along under Tedford. At this point I don't see any of the three facets of the Lions game improving. The ST's lone bright spot that salvages field position for the Lions has been Leone, but our return game hasn't found first gear let alone 4th. The O while showing sparks of success early in the season seems to have been figured out as of late, key on Harris, force Lulay to throw underneath or try and hit the long bomb and the two and outs begin to pile up. I can think of at least three INT's that were better catches against us than any of our own receivers have caught. The receivers simply don't fight for the ball enough, or position themselves to fend off the defenders. The D loses the line of scrimmage battle every game, that puts way to much expectations on the rest of the D to stop first downs from piling up against the Lions. The bend and don't break D doesn't work if 2nd downs are always short yardage situations.

In the end Wally has always counted :beauty: on having superior talent to execute game plans. It is up to him to find that talent now, and that hasn't been case over the past couple of seasons. The other teams in the CFL are much better than they use to be at it, and they are willing to find the next generation of coaching to innovate their game plans. I could sit back and watch the Lions at 3-5, as long as I began to see areas of concern improving, right now that isn't the case, even with one of the few health by starting QB's in the league. I hazard to think where the Lions might be if Durrant and Riley were in the games the Lions have won.
Entertainment value = an all time low
User avatar
CardiacKid
Legend
Posts: 1949
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:46 am
Location: Under Christmas Hill, Saanich

My personal take on this situation vis a vis Wally and Tedford is this was supposed to be a quiet transition year for Wally. Tedford comes in with a new philosophy for the Lions, a familiarity with the league and some of it "names" and a history of some success in the NCAA (along with some bumps). However unlike Kent Austin who is Head Coach, General Manager and VP of Football Operations, Tedford likely wouldn't want all those titles at once given his recent health. For a guy like Wally (who doesn't deny being a control freak) that is probably music to his ears.
While not publicizing it, an old-fashioned guy like Wally is likely to only leave willingly if he feels he can hand over the team in good shape. And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.

However.....I think two things may have served to trip up this transition. One, Wally not being the kind of guy who completely jettisons his crew. Yes, you can argue he shows no loyalty to vets when he thinks they are over the hill (IMO he is far more often correct with those judgements than not...and yes, I agree letting Tim Brown go prematurely was a mistake) but he does show loyalty to the team he assembles and it has shown up throughout his career as being reciprocated. Second, we get a Head Coach who may have been hesitant to accept the challenge of coaching a completely revamped team from stem to stern.

As a result, we have bit of a "Franken-Staff", a mix of Tedford's guys, Tedford-Wally guys and Wally guys. A quick glance at the coaching staffs of Edmonton and Hamilton, shows the guys working for Chris Jones and Kent Austin are "their guys" (at least all were hired after Jones and Austin took over). There is one exception on Hamilton's staff and he appears to have been shifted to a new job since Austin came on board.

I am not going to say so-and-so on the Lion's staff is a bad coach while someone else is a good coach.

My point is...sometimes when you create a working team of professional, knowledgeable people who have different approaches and philosophies, chaos can take over. And I am afraid that is what is occuring now with the Lions. Both Tedford and Wally must have believed there would be teething problems during this transition but not to this degree.

I believe Tedford needs to have a coaching staff that is assembled by him and has all the earmarks of his football philosophy. Everyone on point, everyone in unison, everything consistent.

Think of a coach as a teacher and the players as students....first and foremost, the coaching/teaching has to be consistent or the players/students are lost and have no direction. Don't even think of it within a context of someone's right, someone's wrong.....without a consistent framework or a unified message/vision to act as the foundation of leadership, the team is going to run the risk of being directionless.
User avatar
MexicoLionFan
Legend
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:10 pm

Rammer wrote:If I were to assess the current Lion struggles it would begin with Wally. The release of several key vets over the past two seasons have gutted the leadership and the infield play. Tedford while not showing a progression with the current group that I fully expected, was saddled with McMann and Mark Washington (also the biggest disappointment). Both of those coaching positions have put the Lions at the lowest level statistically of all 9 teams, which is on Wally's shoulders.

In Washington I would think that he is in discussion with Wally and we see the old school Wally D concepts that use to rely on the superior players Wally was blessed with. Right now, the talent of the DL can't get to the QB and can't run stop, that is even with Bighill and SolE (prior to injury).

In the end the saddest part is that I was hoping for a playoff berth, expecting the team to get better as the season moved along under Tedford. At this point I don't see any of the three facets of the Lions game improving. The ST's lone bright spot that salvages field position for the Lions has been Leone, but our return game hasn't found first gear let alone 4th. The O while showing sparks of success early in the season seems to have been figured out as of late, key on Harris, force Lulay to throw underneath or try and hit the long bomb and the two and outs begin to pile up. I can think of at least three INT's that were better catches against us than any of our own receivers have caught. The receivers simply don't fight for the ball enough, or position themselves to fend off the defenders. The D loses the line of scrimmage battle every game, that puts way to much expectations on the rest of the D to stop first downs from piling up against the Lions. The bend and don't break D doesn't work if 2nd downs are always short yardage situations.

In the end Wally has always counted :beauty: on having superior talent to execute game plans. It is up to him to find that talent now, and that hasn't been case over the past couple of seasons. The other teams in the CFL are much better than they use to be at it, and they are willing to find the next generation of coaching to innovate their game plans. I could sit back and watch the Lions at 3-5, as long as I began to see areas of concern improving, right now that isn't the case, even with one of the few health by starting QB's in the league. I hazard to think where the Lions might be if Durrant and Riley were in the games the Lions have won.

Exactly Rammer, I thought the Lions were going to badly struggle out of the gate and felt that 3-6 at the mid way point was likely and OKAY as long as they were trending in the right directions, but they are NOT. Inexplicably we are actually getting worse and worse and that is the responsibility of the Head Coach...and if he doesn't have full power to guide his own team then he should NEVER have accepted the job! Where is the sharp, quick moving, quick thinking team that Tedford boasted about back in Training Camp? Where are the creative offensive systems that he spoke of? Where is the culture of accountability and leadership that he went on and on about? We have the league in penalty yardage for most of the season!

The HAM game was a good one for Lion fans to watch because Austin showed everyone viewing what an actual TEAM functions like. They played FAST and AGGRESSIVE football in all THREE aspects of the game, and they didn't ever let up. The Lions were OUTCLASSED from the opening whistle against HAM starting with the coaching! Tedford spoke a "big game" when he was hired, and since TC, he has just disappeared...BIZARRE to say the least.

And think about this nugget, by putting Lulay into an offensive system that works against his natural abilities, he has STRUGGLED mightily and digressed, and the only other QB getting any other snaps is a 34 year old "has-been" that has a ZERO future in the CFL. As bad as we are as a team, we haven't even begun to develop a potential replacement which could take years to groom and I am not even sure that player is on the roster? Just look at how well the Lions have handled the Safety position after the retirement of Barrin Miles!!! Apply that to the QB position...yikes.
"Condemnation Without Investigation is the height of ignorance."

Albert Einstein
InUrFace
Rookie
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:31 pm

CardiacKid wrote:My personal take on this situation vis a vis Wally and Tedford is this was supposed to be a quiet transition year for Wally. Tedford comes in with a new philosophy for the Lions, a familiarity with the league and some of it "names" and a history of some success in the NCAA (along with some bumps). However unlike Kent Austin who is Head Coach, General Manager and VP of Football Operations, Tedford likely wouldn't want all those titles at once given his recent health. For a guy like Wally (who doesn't deny being a control freak) that is probably music to his ears.
While not publicizing it, an old-fashioned guy like Wally is likely to only leave willingly if he feels he can hand over the team in good shape. And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.

However.....I think two things may have served to trip up this transition. One, Wally not being the kind of guy who completely jettisons his crew. Yes, you can argue he shows no loyalty to vets when he thinks they are over the hill (IMO he is far more often correct with those judgements than not...and yes, I agree letting Tim Brown go prematurely was a mistake) but he does show loyalty to the team he assembles and it has shown up throughout his career as being reciprocated. Second, we get a Head Coach who may have been hesitant to accept the challenge of coaching a completely revamped team from stem to stern.

As a result, we have bit of a "Franken-Staff", a mix of Tedford's guys, Tedford-Wally guys and Wally guys. A quick glance at the coaching staffs of Edmonton and Hamilton, shows the guys working for Chris Jones and Kent Austin are "their guys" (at least all were hired after Jones and Austin took over). There is one exception on Hamilton's staff and he appears to have been shifted to a new job since Austin came on board.

I am not going to say so-and-so on the Lion's staff is a bad coach while someone else is a good coach.

My point is...sometimes when you create a working team of professional, knowledgeable people who have different approaches and philosophies, chaos can take over. And I am afraid that is what is occuring now with the Lions. Both Tedford and Wally must have believed there would be teething problems during this transition but not to this degree.

I believe Tedford needs to have a coaching staff that is assembled by him and has all the earmarks of his football philosophy. Everyone on point, everyone in unison, everything consistent.

Think of a coach as a teacher and the players as students....first and foremost, the coaching/teaching has to be consistent or the players/students are lost and have no direction. Don't even think of it within a context of someone's right, someone's wrong.....without a consistent framework or a unified message/vision to act as the foundation of leadership, the team is going to run the risk of being directionless.
Its like Wally and this franchize is living in Flinstones era and the rest is in the Jestsons.
User avatar
KnowItAll
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7458
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Delta

InUrFace wrote:
CardiacKid wrote:My personal take on this situation vis a vis Wally and Tedford is this was supposed to be a quiet transition year for Wally. Tedford comes in with a new philosophy for the Lions, a familiarity with the league and some of it "names" and a history of some success in the NCAA (along with some bumps). However unlike Kent Austin who is Head Coach, General Manager and VP of Football Operations, Tedford likely wouldn't want all those titles at once given his recent health. For a guy like Wally (who doesn't deny being a control freak) that is probably music to his ears.
While not publicizing it, an old-fashioned guy like Wally is likely to only leave willingly if he feels he can hand over the team in good shape. And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.

However.....I think two things may have served to trip up this transition. One, Wally not being the kind of guy who completely jettisons his crew. Yes, you can argue he shows no loyalty to vets when he thinks they are over the hill (IMO he is far more often correct with those judgements than not...and yes, I agree letting Tim Brown go prematurely was a mistake) but he does show loyalty to the team he assembles and it has shown up throughout his career as being reciprocated. Second, we get a Head Coach who may have been hesitant to accept the challenge of coaching a completely revamped team from stem to stern.

As a result, we have bit of a "Franken-Staff", a mix of Tedford's guys, Tedford-Wally guys and Wally guys. A quick glance at the coaching staffs of Edmonton and Hamilton, shows the guys working for Chris Jones and Kent Austin are "their guys" (at least all were hired after Jones and Austin took over). There is one exception on Hamilton's staff and he appears to have been shifted to a new job since Austin came on board.

I am not going to say so-and-so on the Lion's staff is a bad coach while someone else is a good coach.

My point is...sometimes when you create a working team of professional, knowledgeable people who have different approaches and philosophies, chaos can take over. And I am afraid that is what is occuring now with the Lions. Both Tedford and Wally must have believed there would be teething problems during this transition but not to this degree.

I believe Tedford needs to have a coaching staff that is assembled by him and has all the earmarks of his football philosophy. Everyone on point, everyone in unison, everything consistent.

Think of a coach as a teacher and the players as students....first and foremost, the coaching/teaching has to be consistent or the players/students are lost and have no direction. Don't even think of it within a context of someone's right, someone's wrong.....without a consistent framework or a unified message/vision to act as the foundation of leadership, the team is going to run the risk of being directionless.
Its like Wally and this franchize is living in Flinstones era and the rest is in the Jestsons.
flintstone would beat the jetsons :wink:
Every day that passes is one you can't get back
Rocko604
Rookie
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 11:15 pm

No one can deny what Braley has done for the Lions and the CFL. Without him this forum doesn't exist.

While him living in Hamilton doesn't hurt the team I do wonder if it has at least some effect on the club. The Lions are the only team in Vancouver without a local owner and when looking at the profiles of the other franchises (Canucks excluded because it's NHL and we're in Canada), the Lions seem to struggle behind in creating a buzz (away from TSN 1040 at least) like the Whitecaps or even Canadians.

Having said all that, CFL interest in this city seems to be cyclical when you look at the historical attendance, and the city itself is difficult to play in when you're losing. The product we have on the field right now, and the past two seasons, is certainly playing a role in the low crowds, and that's on Wally. If we're 6-2 and playing like Hamilton, the lower bowl is full.
User avatar
cromartie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 2:31 pm
Location: Cleveland, usually

And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.
He did hand it over to his heir apparent, who coughed up a furball. Hence the reason we have Tedford.

As for the business side, I'm always hesitant to go with a clean sweep as I remember what this franchise was like before Bob Ackles came back. But I'm well past tired of the grandstanding Skulsky, who seems to not understand that being seen but not heard is part of his job description.

When you have a Coach/GM arrangement, the GM has to be able to let the Head Coach make the coaching decisions, including the formation of his own staff. Tedford came to the CFL knowing one guy (Cortez) and relied on Wally for the rest and I suspect he realized pretty quickly that that was a mistake, hence the position he's in now.

So with Wally at the helm, we're kind of caught in no man's land as a franchise. If you bring in someone from the states, you're relying on Wally who saddles you with McMann and Washington. And decent in league candidates won't take the job because they already know they won't have lattitude with scheme/staffing differences with Wally.

Fortunately, I suppose, the solution to this is above my pay grade, but something has to give.
User avatar
JohnHenry
Champion
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:46 pm
Location: Crescent Beach

It seems the Lions talent-level has fallen off since Obie is no longer doing our player personelle. :violin:
User avatar
MexicoLionFan
Legend
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:10 pm

cromartie wrote:
And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.
He did hand it over to his heir apparent, who coughed up a furball. Hence the reason we have Tedford.

As for the business side, I'm always hesitant to go with a clean sweep as I remember what this franchise was like before Bob Ackles came back. But I'm well past tired of the grandstanding Skulsky, who seems to not understand that being seen but not heard is part of his job description.

When you have a Coach/GM arrangement, the GM has to be able to let the Head Coach make the coaching decisions, including the formation of his own staff. Tedford came to the CFL knowing one guy (Cortez) and relied on Wally for the rest and I suspect he realized pretty quickly that that was a mistake, hence the position he's in now.

So with Wally at the helm, we're kind of caught in no man's land as a franchise. If you bring in someone from the states, you're relying on Wally who saddles you with McMann and Washington. And decent in league candidates won't take the job because they already know they won't have lattitude with scheme/staffing differences with Wally.

Fortunately, I suppose, the solution to this is above my pay grade, but something has to give.

Cro, to add to what you said, I think we had a good coach in Kelly Bates who had the potential to be a great one, and no he's gone FOR DOING A GOOD JOB. As our RB Coach, we had great production from all of our RBs and he really helped Harris improve with his pass blocking, plus, Kelly did an excellent job, IMO, as our Draft Coordinator...why is he gone? I really like Doug Malone, but there was no need for Kelly to go anywhere.

And do any of you remember Washington's comments on the radio directly after the MTL playoff loss last year??? He made it clear that "someone" was pushing him to play a passive defence and that he had learned his lesson for next season if he was asked to come back...a LIE...he hasn't learned a damn thing!
"Condemnation Without Investigation is the height of ignorance."

Albert Einstein
User avatar
Toppy Vann
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9793
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm

http://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040- ... e-1.351339

BMAC on 1040 with Cam Wake. Impressive. Humble guy who sounds no different than when he was BC.

Then there's Cris Carter .. how can they not fire that guy for advising rookies to find a fall guy to go to jail for him.
"Ability without character will lose." - Marv Levy
InUrFace
Rookie
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:31 pm

MexicoLionFan wrote:
cromartie wrote:
And hand it over to someone he is comfortable with regarding as an heir apparent. And on the face of it, Tedford totally fits the bill with his previous success, his connections, his familiarity with the CFL and his declaration of being a proponent of up-tempo, entertaining football.
He did hand it over to his heir apparent, who coughed up a furball. Hence the reason we have Tedford.

As for the business side, I'm always hesitant to go with a clean sweep as I remember what this franchise was like before Bob Ackles came back. But I'm well past tired of the grandstanding Skulsky, who seems to not understand that being seen but not heard is part of his job description.

When you have a Coach/GM arrangement, the GM has to be able to let the Head Coach make the coaching decisions, including the formation of his own staff. Tedford came to the CFL knowing one guy (Cortez) and relied on Wally for the rest and I suspect he realized pretty quickly that that was a mistake, hence the position he's in now.

So with Wally at the helm, we're kind of caught in no man's land as a franchise. If you bring in someone from the states, you're relying on Wally who saddles you with McMann and Washington. And decent in league candidates won't take the job because they already know they won't have lattitude with scheme/staffing differences with Wally.

Fortunately, I suppose, the solution to this is above my pay grade, but something has to give.

Cro, to add to what you said, I think we had a good coach in Kelly Bates who had the potential to be a great one, and no he's gone FOR DOING A GOOD JOB. As our RB Coach, we had great production from all of our RBs and he really helped Harris improve with his pass blocking, plus, Kelly did an excellent job, IMO, as our Draft Coordinator...why is he gone? I really like Doug Malone, but there was no need for Kelly to go anywhere.

And do any of you remember Washington's comments on the radio directly after the MTL playoff loss last year??? He made it clear that "someone" was pushing him to play a passive defence and that he had learned his lesson for next season if he was asked to come back...a LIE...he hasn't learned a damn thing!
Your totally right about Bates and now we have Mcmann coaching RBs wtf. He should of been gone along with Washington but thats on Wally wanting to have some of his loyalists around still. which now makes it hard for Jeff. I know if a HC hhad full control both of them would of been shown the door. Now 1040 today said Wally is pissed and there will be major change coming. Or is this all talk again.
Edit by Team Captain: Edited for comments that are contrary to the sites rules.
User avatar
DanoT
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4314
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. in summer, Sun Peaks Resort in winter

Wally saying that there are going to be changes likely doesn't include himself. IMO he is past his best before date and he should retire at the end of the season but AFAIK his contract goes to the end of 2016 so we might have him still calling too many of the shots for another year and a half.

The other thing that concerns me is that Wally probably doesn't want to retire, leaving when the team is a train wreck. But train wreck is exactly what this team is right now and a few tweaks here and there, a few NFL cuts, are not going to get things back on track.
User avatar
squishy35
Legend
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Kamloops, B.C.

Would love to see Dave Ritchie back as a DC.....
Post Reply